Integrated JCO & OR Cadre for the Army
Introduction
Junior Commissioned Officers and Other Rank (JCO
& OR) make up more than 94 per cent of the Army and belong to a
distinct functional area arranged in a hierarchical order with different ranks
representing different grades or levels of resp. They possess an intimate
knowledge of the particular area or the function or the skill concerned. For
example an Infantry soldier is expert at Close Quarter Combat in its multiple
dimensions. Combat Support Arms like Artillery are the specialists in delivery
of accurate long range fire with complex gun systems. Similarly the services
are meant to provide logistics and technical support to the Combat Arms and
Combat Support Arms.
They retire young due to severely restricted growth
opportunities with a low pension. Consequently soldiering today has become last
option amongst the eligible and only reason recruitment quotas are still being
met is high levels of unemployment.
Main cause - Lack
of Promotion Avenues. Sad fact is that career of 65 per cent entrants ends as Sepoys within
17 years at young age of 36 years and even for those who become Naik can at the
most hope to become Havildars and retire at the age of 42 years, that is, 16
years earlier than their counterparts from other government departments
including constables from Border Security Force and Central Reserve Police
Force.
Compounding factor
– Multiplicity of Cadres within the Army. The problem is further compounded due to the
present practice of letting respective arms and services manage the careers of
their JCOs and OR. This has resulted in creation of plethora of stand-alone
cadres. Ostensible reason for this separation is `specialisation of the task’
resulting in creation of a distinct entry scheme, albeit with same civil
education qualification, that is, matric. But this logic does not apply to the
officers who form single cadre. Similarly medical officers in Army Medical Corps
despite there being separate specialities form one cadre.
The present system of every arm and service having
separate cadre of JCO & OR blocks intra-Army movement of deserving soldiers
between various corps/ services and thereby reduces promotion chances of
soldiers who join combat arms. This system has also resulted in creation of
redundant training facilities as each arm or service duplicates similar
training facilities.
Lateral
Transfer – A Non-starter. Army has been making strenuous efforts to open the route of `lateral
transfer to Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF). But these efforts have been
stymied by vested interests and certain legal provisions like reservations
applicable to recruitment in CAPF.
Integrated JCO & OR
Cadre for the Army
Aim and Objectives
Aim. Last cadre review of JCO
& OR was undertaken in the year 1984 and time has come for creation of an Integrated
JCOs and OR Cadre in the Army which complies with organisational needs and also
ensures a rewarding career to deserving JCOs and OR.
Quick Facts
about Integrated JCOs & OR Cadre.
·
Reinforces distinct position and status for the JCOs and Havildars in
Combat Arms and Combat Support Arms less Corps of Signals ranks corresponding
to grade or level of hierarchy. Consequently existing ratios between JCOs,
Havildars and OR is maintained.
·
Recognises the necessity of coalescing JCO and Havildar ranks in the technical
arms like Corps of Signals, Services, Minor Corps and Clerks with higher degree
of technical prowess or inventory management and supervisory functions by
improving existing Corps Roster system of promotion wherein the rank is not
tied in with appointment. Consequently these organisations will have larger
number of Naiks, Havildars and JCOs vis-à-vis Sepoys.
·
Youthful profile at unit level is most critical for combat arms, is
desirable in combat support arm and of peripheral value for Corps of Signals
and Services. This has been achieved by introducing mid-career re-training and
re-deployment from Combat Arms and Combat Support Arms to Corps of Signals,
Services, Minor Corps and Clerks in forming Integrated JCO & OR Cadre.
·
Proposed Cadre structure substantially reduces age profile of Section
Commander equivalent in Comabt and Combaqt Support Arms.
·
Provides opportunity to every individual to aspire for at least four
promotions during his/ her career spanning 33 years of colour service.
·
Proposed Integrated JCO & OR Cadre induces healthy competition
amongst peers as retention and promotion are based on Annual Performance Report.
Desirable composition of
Integrated JCOs & OR Cadre. The ranks for the JCOs & OR and size of each
rank tabulated below in Table 1 have been validated by comparison with major contemporary
armies.
|
Rank
|
Proposed
|
Percentage
|
Equal UK Rank
|
Percentage
|
Equal US Rank
|
Percentage
|
|
Sepoy
|
308437
|
26.6
|
Private 4,3,2 & 1
|
28.2
|
Private E 1 & 2
|
14.2
|
|
Lance Nk
|
|
Lance Corporal
|
14.1
|
Private E 3
|
14.1
|
|
|
Nk
|
357865
|
30.9
|
Corporal
|
17.7
|
Corporal E 4
|
26.8
|
|
Lance Hav
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hav
|
283229
|
24.4
|
Sargent
|
27.8
|
Sargent E 5
|
18.1
|
|
Hav Maj
|
|
Colour Sargent
|
Staff Sargent E 6
|
14.2
|
||
|
Nb Sub
|
87623
|
7.6
|
Sargent 1st Cl
|
6.5
|
Sargent 1st Cl E 7
|
9.2
|
|
Sub
|
87623
|
7.6
|
WO Cl 2
|
4.9
|
Master Sargent E 8
|
2.6
|
|
SM
|
12000
|
1
|
WO Cl 1
|
1.8
|
Sargent Major E 9
|
0.8
|
|
Total
|
1160000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1
Proposed Rank
Profile of Arms and Services. The army-wide rank ratios indicated in Table 1
above will have to be distributed in combat arms and other as per Table 2 below
to meet the terms of reference listed below.
·
The Combat Arms have to have a pyramidal structure even amongst the
JCOs and OR because it is a functional requirement. However certain amount of
flattening is possible at Sepoy to Naik level even in Infantry and Armoured
Corps.
·
In case of Combat Support Arms this flattening is possible up to Havildar
level.
·
The Services, which make up 25 per cent of the Army, have a Corps
Roster system of promotion and rank is not tied in with appointment.
Consequently these can have equal number of Naiks, Havildars and JCOs.
·
Youthful profile at unit level is most critical for combat arms, is
desirable in combat support arm and of peripheral value for services.
Age and
Service Profile of JCOs & OR in proposed Cadre. Consequent to application
of above mentioned rank ratios the age and service profile of JCO & OR
Cadres obtaining in various arms and services of the Army will be as shown in Table
2 below.
|
Cadre
|
JCO
|
Havildar
|
Naik
|
Sepoy
|
||||
|
|
Age
|
Service
|
Age
|
Service
|
Age
|
Service
|
Age
|
Service
|
|
Combat
Arms
|
41 – 48
|
23 – 29@
|
34-40
|
16 – 22
|
27-33
|
9 -15
|
19-26
|
0
- 8
|
|
Combat
Support
|
44 – 51
|
26 - 33
|
36 – 43
|
18 – 25
|
28 - 35
|
10 – 17
|
20-27
|
0
– 9
|
|
Services
|
44 – 51
|
28 – 33
|
36 – 43
|
20 – 28
|
27 – 35
|
11 – 19
|
20 – 27
|
0
– 10
|
|
Minor
Corps & Clerks
|
44 – 51
|
28 – 33
|
36 – 43
|
20 – 28
|
27 – 35
|
11 – 19
|
|
0
– 10
|
|
Combatised
Tradesmen
|
44 - 51
|
26 – 33
|
36 – 43
|
18 – 25
|
27 – 35
|
10 – 17
|
20 – 27
|
1
– 9
|
@ JCO of Combat Arm will get nine year tenure in NCC
after mandatory period in Parent Arm.
Table 2
Methodology of
Implementation
Army
Strength. Periodic media reports put
Indian Army strength at 1.2 million. For the purpose of illustration let us distribute
these numbers into four categories of arms and services as given in Table 3
below. It is pertinent to note that change in numbers will not impact viability
of proposed JCO & OR Cadre because proportionate numbers of various arms
and services are unlikely to change.
|
Category
|
UK Army
|
US Army
|
Best Average
|
Rank wise Numbers
(if average applied to Indian Army)
|
||||
|
Total
|
Sepoy
|
Naik
|
Havildar
|
JCO
|
||||
|
Combat Arms
|
34
|
38
|
40
|
444584
|
177834
|
177834
|
57795
|
31121
|
|
Combat Support Arm
|
16.3
|
15
|
17.85
|
196403
|
75547
|
75546
|
28862
|
16448
|
|
Corps of Engineer
|
9
|
8
|
8
|
88000
|
35819
|
35818
|
11673
|
4690
|
|
Corps of Signals
|
8
|
7
|
6
|
65656
|
412
|
4112
|
36666
|
24466
|
|
Services
|
28
|
27
|
24
|
264000
|
825
|
44454
|
131233
|
87488
|
|
Minor Corps & Clerks
|
4.7
|
5
|
3.75
|
41357
|
|
2600
|
23223
|
15534
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1100000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combatised Tradesmen
|
Proportionately distributed to all Arms and
Services.
|
60000
|
18000
|
17500
|
17000
|
7500
|
||
|
Officers
|
40000 Accounted for separately
|
|||||||
|
Grand Total
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
1200000
|
308437
|
357865
|
283229
|
187247
|
Table 3
Qualifications
for Recruitment. All soldiers will be recruited
in X Grade. Minimum education qualification for enrolment will be 10 + 2. Physical
parameters and Recruit-able Male Population (RMP) ratios will remain as
hither-to-fore.
First Review. All Sepoys of Combat Arms will be screened
for first transfer on completion of seven years colour service in parent unit. Those
from Combat Support Arms will be screened on completion of eight years in
parent unit.
Reconciling Rank and Seniority on Transfer. Those
selected for transfer will undergo conversion training in new Corps and then
posted to services units. Those transferred from Combat Units will serve for
one year in the rank of Sepoy and then be promoted to the rank of Naik. Those
transferred from Combat Arms (Less Engineers) to Signals and Minor Corps will
be absorbed in the rank of Naik immediately on completion of conversion
training.
Assured
Efficient Service. All entrants will be assured 33 years of services provided they maintain
desired efficiency levels. Recruits will initially sign up for 15 year colour
service under the Open Engagement (OE) which will allow them to retire with
pension on completion of OE period. This 15 year period will commence the day
recruit is accepted at Training Centre and will include entire training
period as also post attestation period. Formal Annual Efficiency Reviews
will be held to judge the soldier’s continued suitability for continuation.
Promotions. Combat Arms will enjoy
distinct edge in promotions as seen in Table 3 above, wherein promotion in
Combat Arm will be at an interval of seven years, eight years in Combat Support
Arms and nine years in Signals, Services and Minor Corps .
Management of Implementation
Reconciling
All India All Class Recruitment with Fixed Class Recruitment. Intake based on Recruitable Male Population (RMP)
ensures that the Army has proportionate representation to all regions of the
country. RMP is arrived at using figures from latest Census of India and
accordingly vacancies for recruitment allocated to various States of the Union
of India. Personnel so selected are allotted to various arms and services. All
Combat Support Arms and Services have All India – All Class composition.
However certain units or Combat Arms, that is, Infantry and Armoured Corps have
fixed class composition, which means those serving in these units are from a
particular area or caste. Overall 76 per
cent of Indian Army units are composed on All India - All Class Basis and 26
per cent, which are Infantry or Armoured Corps Regiments, on Fixed Class composition.
Thus in effect out of 12434 Sepoys coming up for inter-arm transfer every year
from combat arms to the Services 5017 will come from All India - All Class
Units and 7417 will come from fixed class Regiments like Sikh and Dogra who
have troops from Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu
and Jat and Rajput from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan and Sikh
from Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan. Nearly 40 per cent of Indian population
resides in these states the transferees from Fixed Class units will be easily adjusted
within All India – All Class units of Services because overall recruitment
remains within the RMP quota of these states.
Combat Arms
and Transfer to Services. Initial intake in to Combat Arms will be 27714 per annum. On
completion of 14 years’ service in units 15807 Naiks will be transferred to Services.
A total of 2500 will be transferred to Defence Security Corps and 9004 will be
retained and promoted Havildar in parent arm. Expected discharge/ release rate
will be 500 per annum.
·
Rate of Direct Intake into
Services. 15 per cent of total strength of services will
be inducted through direct recruitment at a rate of 100 per annum.
·
Lateral Transfer into
Services. 85 per cent of the strength of services will
be inducted through lateral transfer with 15807 Sepoys side-stepping into
services after 14 years of service in Combat Arms and one years of conversion
training.
·
Transfer into DSC. The DSC will be entirely
composed of transferees from Combat Arms, who will be inducted as Naiks at a
rate of 2500 per annum after 14 years of service in parent arm. They will get
to serve in DSC for next 18 years including three month long conversion course.
Combat Support
Arms (Less Corps of Engineers) and Transfer
to Corps of Signals and Minor Corps. Initial
intake in to Artillery, Army Air Defence and Army Aviation will be 14313 per
annum. On completion of 16 years’ service in units 6855 will be transferred to Minor
Corps and Clerks per annum. 6535 will be retained and promoted Havildar/
equivalent. Expected discharge/ release rate will be 950 per annum.
·
Direct Intake into Corps of
Signals and Minor Corps. 15 per cent of total strength of Corps of Signals will be inducted
through direct recruitment at a rate of 421 per annum. While rate of direct
induction into Minor Corps will be 100 per annum.
·
Lateral Transfer into Corps
of Signals, Minor Corps and Clerks. 85 per cent
of the strength of the following will come from Artillery, Air Defence
Artillery and Army Aviation and undergo one year conversion training and be
inducted as Havildars:
o Corps of Signals will get
4035 per annum.
o Minor Corps will get 1320
per annum.
o Clerks Cadre will get 1500
per annum.
Management of
JCO & OR of Corps of Engineers. Sappers will be inducted into Corps of Engineers at
a rate of 4634 per annum. On completion of initial eight years of service in field
Engineer units they will be sub-divided and re-deployed with 1592 retained in field
units and 2500 transferred to MES and promoted Naik. Those transferred to MES will
undergo three years long diploma course and then appointed Junior Engineer.
Hence total strength of military component in MES will be 40000 including
trainees. Expected discharge/ release rate will be 542 per annum.
Conclusion
Purpose. The purpose of proposal is to sustain
the Army’s operational effectiveness. A Cadre Structure is meant to provide the
framework to populate each Arm or Service of the Army with soldiers of the
correct rank, age, experience and quality. It will also balance the needs of
the Army with individual expectations.
Advantages. Major advantages which
accrue from implementation of proposal are:
·
Reduce Financial burden on
Exchequer.
Will reduce outlay on pension by ensuring 33 years long service to the
deserving JCOs & OR.
·
Improve morale of the Troops. Guarantee of 33 years long
service to deserving will motivate JCOs
and OR and attract better talent.
·
Youthful profile in Combat
and Combat Support Arms. Mid-career redeployment will ensure young profile in the Combat Arms
and Combat Support Arms.
·
Improved quality of intake into
Services.
Initial grounding of soldier in the Combat Arms and Combat Support Arms will
broaden his horizon as also make mature, better disciplined and experienced
soldiers to services.
·
Tap in-house talent. Since the vacancies for
technical appointments will be filled from in-house transfers, this will act as
incentive to OR to keep learning.
·
Optimal Utlisation of
in-house Training Facilities. The Army has created one of the most extensive
in-house training network capable of imparting training in almost all fids of
human endeavour. This will be fully utilised.
To implement proposed Cadre
structures for the JCOs and OR, it is necessary that the implementation be
coordinated and monitored by an empowered committee headed by VCOAS.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home